<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>False Negatives on Cyshield Seclab</title><link>https://seclab.cyshield.com/tags/false-negatives/</link><description>Recent content in False Negatives on Cyshield Seclab</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 Cyshield.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://seclab.cyshield.com/tags/false-negatives/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why High Accuracy Can Still Mean Bad Security!</title><link>https://seclab.cyshield.com/posts/why-high-accuracy-can-still-mean-bad-security/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://seclab.cyshield.com/posts/why-high-accuracy-can-still-mean-bad-security/</guid><description>High accuracy in security does not guarantee real-world protection. Through the WAMM research study, this post examines what accuracy metrics hide, how false positives and false negatives manifest in production environments, and what a security-grade evaluation framework should actually measure.</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://seclab.cyshield.com/posts/why-high-accuracy-can-still-mean-bad-security/featured.webp"/></item></channel></rss>